Tuesday, November 18, 2008
British vs. Italian Style
I had a request the other day to write about the Italian menswear tradition, which is difficult for me to do. For there are a number of important threads of Italian influence in the well dressed man of the world's clothing but I don't think of them as forming a tradition in the sense that the passeggiata on the piazza is a tradition. But I do have a few observations about the difference between British and Italian style.
First and foremost, Italian style is about dressing to look good. Turning the ladies' heads is part of the game. This is radically different from British style, which has historically been about dressing to fit in. At its best, Italian style borrows tradition from the British and makes it look more attractive.
Often that look is softer and lighter as well, for the Italians are the masters at making lightweight suits that remain relatively unrumpled in the warmest weather. They may have been driven to learn by their warmer climate, and it may have been the British who taught the tailors of Naples how to cut cloth in the 19th century, but in this area the pupils have surpassed the masters. And Carlo Barbera in particular has built upon this advantage by pioneering the weaving of lightweight worsteds for Brioni and others, though I've never been convinced of the usefulness of that stuff.
In my experience, most of the best respected Italian tailors sew Italian-influenced British designs using British cloth. The differences are at the margin and in the combinations. Italian style is a bit more shaped, a little more casual and easy going, and often slightly more colorful.
If British style is a pinstriped suit worn with black oxfords, a shirt with turnback cuffs and a polka dot silk necktie, then Italian style is a two piece double breasted, worn with dark brown shoes, a shirt with button cuffs and a cashmere necktie. Both styles use the white linen pocket square for business dress, but the Britisher's is neatly folded while the Italian's is arranged in his pocket.
Then again, consider Italian style icon Luca di Montezemolo in the photograph. Maybe there's not that much difference after all. Aside from the leather bracelets.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)






7 comments:
It would be interesting to get your take on shoes as well. How would John Lobb or Edward Green differ from Bontoni or Kiton?
Nice post. I've always wanted to hear an expert explain the differences. One thing that seems a bit out of character is having cufflinks (jewelry) associated with the British and buttons (plain) with the Italians.
It's passeggiata, not passegiata ;)
Fixed. Thanks pablo.
Will, are you sure that British style is so conformist? I've always thought there to be far more room in British style for individual eccentricity - often at the edges or in the accessories - than in Italian, which is like the wider culture to which it belongs often more about uniformity than personal expression.
Italian style is certainly more colourful and playful - but is dressing in conservative colours and cuts necessarily 'dressing to fit in'?
Hi, I've found your wonderful blog just today.
This is indeed an interesting article.
I didn't know that there were such differences between British and Italian styles.
From now on, I will check your blog from time to time so I can improve my knowledge about men's fashion!
I've noticed in many pictures of Mr. Montezemolo that he frequently wears a small, round red and green lapel pin with what looks to be some sort of gold in the center. Does anyone know the significance of this pin? Is it a Ferrari pin, something to signify Italian nationality, something else all together?
Post a Comment