Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Non-Disruptive


I was an exponent for a while (and still backslide from time to time) but have come to believe that brightly colored socks are just too twentieth century. I prefer the way that a non-disruptive difference in pattern and color between socks and trousers is visually interesting without shocking the observer.

8 comments:

Richard said...

I would wear brightly coloured socks with an outfit that include other bright colours. Otherwise not.

JH said...

Rule I go by, if wearing a brightly colored tie/silk item...socks can match. Not so shocking then.

JH said...

Rule I go by... If wearing a brightly colored tie/square...the socks can be the same. That's not so shocking to others.

oldsarj said...

'Non-disruptive' is fine for business but on one's own time, give me color!

Downunder said...

Define "brightly coloured socks" please.

The Weekend Tailor said...

Don't think I've ever worn anything more exciting than forest green. I've always been low-key in the socks department.

I'm not planning to become a part-time clown anytime soon.

N said...

Do you mean a "proponent" rather than exponent?

Regardless, I still like brightly coloured socks in small doses.

Will said...

I meant exponent.

 
Blog Widget by LinkWithin