Tuesday, February 14, 2012

The Perplexities of Pinky Rings


Within ‘This Thing of Ours,’ guys pretty much agree on the really important stuff: artisan tailoring (which need not necessarily be bespoke), bench-made shoes (again, bespoke or top-of-the-line ready-mades), handkerchiefs with hand-rolled edges, etc. Outside of these main pillars solidarity breaks down a little bit, and there is room for, to use a word coined by Xavier Cugat, “opinionation.”

A major bone of contention is the pinky ring—whether or not it should be worn. The Duke of Windsor wore one. So did Tony Biddle. The Prince of Wales wears one now, as do André Churchwell and Alan Flusser. I wear mine, when I can find the wretched thing. But for every guy who wears a pinky ring, I can think of another well-dressed man who does not. Bruce Boyer, for example, wears his wedding band, but no pinky ring. I’ve never met Mr. Boyer, but I have a strong sense that nothing short of a gun in his ribs could make him wear one.

For some guys, the pinky ring is a bit too déclassé; a little too Cosa Nostra. I wear one because I like the idea of a guy who is otherwise dressed in perfectly good taste, yet has this shiny little touch sinister dangling from his little finger. It’s a nice counterpoint to a classic outfit, as well as being just the merest hint that maybe you have a dark side.

The pinky ring is also a good way to identify other members of ‘The Glorious Club.’ If I see a guy wearing a well-made suit and shoes, I’m not sure of his motivation—he could be dressing for the office, a woman, or both. To a slightly lesser degree, the same could be said of a guy in a good sport coat, tie, and odd trousers. But if I see a well-decked out guy wearing a pinky ring, the ring is the sure sign that the guy is dressing for himself.

Now, let’s say you were a non-believer who’s decided to take the plunge. Which hand? For some guys, this not-so-trivial consideration is a headache-maker. The prevailing school of thought says to wear it on your right hand, since the left side is already so loaded up: most men wear their watches on their left wrist, and your boutonniere and pocket square are obviously on that side. If you wear hats, even the bow is on the left, and if you wear a feather in your hat—which goes in the bow—well, the right side of your body can look almost naked by comparison. The impoverished right side has only your ticket pocket, if the jacket you’re wearing that day happens to have one.

Then there are the guys who, for reasons known only to themselves, favor a fully loaded left side. Still can’t decide? Then use the William Rhinelander Stuart Solution: wear ‘em on both hands (In case you’re wondering, Alan Flusser and Churchwell are both ‘right-handers.’ I myself am a bit of an odd duck: I switch mine back and forth, often several times during the course of a single day. There are, I hope, worse and weirder habits out there).

Now, as to what your pinky ring should look like—guess what; I’m not going to tell you what it should look like. ‘Our Thing’ has too much dogma already: guys who think a pocket square should be angled a certain way and no other; who don’t think pocket squares and boutonnieres should be worn at the same time; who consider red neckties suitable only for Mondays in July—the list of ad hoc rules is endless. We have allowed preferences to become pronouncements. Every guy wants to be a sixteenth century pope, and we are only a hairsbreadth away from starting our own fashion inquisition. Not that I don’t know where the dogmatism comes from. The intentions are actually good. There is a lot of grotesque menswear out there, and naturally we don’t want it creeping into ‘this Thing’ we’ve built up. Ugly menswear is our equivalent of a stool-pigeon, and, in order for any clandestine organization to survive, stool-pigeons must be rooted out and destroyed. We just have to be careful that, like actual mob bosses, our zeal does not turn into paranoia, and we wind up cutting each other’s throats over the wrong choice of a sock.

So the choice in pinky rings is yours. There is the standard gold or silver signet, but there are also endless variations: gold set with any variety of precious stones, silver folk rings are not out of the question, and, extra-special, solid black onyx rings edged in gold, and inlaid with gems of your choosing. The sky’s the limit. Knock yourself out.

I will, however, reverse myself slightly and make two rules about pinky rings. When you hear what they are, I think you’ll forgive me. First, make the thing considerably smaller than a golf ball. Secondly, and this is an absolute must, NO GOLD NUGGETS. You all know exactly what kind of ring I’m talking about. If I catch you wearing one of those unforgivably rococo gold nugget rings, I will be forced to assume that at some point in your life, probably in a dark, candle-lit basement somewhere (in Jersey), you have uttered the words, “May I burn like this saint if I ever betray my friends…”

-Text by Barry Pullen

11 comments:

wesman said...

Hi Barry - I enjoyed this post. I've worn pinky rings for years - though, unfortunately, hindsight has shown me to have done so with varying degrees of class :)

I'll be getting married in July and I've been looking for quite some time for a non-boring, yet non-mafioso looking ring (I try not to let my Jersey upbringing show). While researching different types of rings, I found a few articles that discuss the fact that a man's wedding ring is a recently-developed symbol that rose to popularity during WWII.

The reason I mention this is to point out why some of the royalty you mention wear pinky rings. You will notice that these gentlemen wear two pinky rings: a small wedding band tucked behind a larger familial signet!

While it may appear to most Americans that these are the type of ostentatious pinky rings we associate with gangsters and pimps, they are actually not far removed from the wedding bands that we accept universally. They just go on a different finger.

This also explains while you'll find them on the "overloaded" left-hand side.

Unknown said...

Up here in the frozen north (Canada), we have something called the "Iron Ring". It's only worn on the pinky of the working hand of an engineer trained in Canada.

They typically are worn right into the grave as our fingers have fattened up so much they can't be removed.

When you see the ring, you can always tell an engineer. But you can't tell him much.

tom ta said...

In europe descendents of noble families still wear familial signets, whether it is in Italy, France, the uk or Germany. This has nothing to do with fashion, thats why I don't really understand this blog entry. This is about family tradition. I suppose there are not so many of these aristrocratic families and traditions in the new world, but I would never buy myself a ring to wear it on my so called pinky finger. This feels really a bit odd.

oldsarj said...

My father fancied a ruby in gold and on those occasions when I wear one, I use my University alumni ring. I'd wear Dad's but I have no idea where it got off to. Since he was cremated I doubt that it went to the grave with him.

Of course, being of Italian extraction, any chance to look sinister and menacing is always to be enjoyed to the fullest! :-D

Horatio said...

I wore a pinky ring (left hand)--a simple silver band--until I got married. Now I wear my wedding band (white gold, on my ring finger, of course).

Fred Astaire also favored a pinky ring, on his right hand. However, he didn't always wear one. I've never seen a picture with him wearing a wedding band.

I'd consider a signet pinky ring for my right hand, but I'm in no hurry. First I'd have to buy the wax to seal envelopes with ;-)

John said...

Just an opinion.... (but what else are blogs and comments?)

1) Wear the pinkie on whichever hand is most comfortable. (So what if left side gets loaded-up?)

2) No glittery facetted gemstones. (cabochons are preferable.)


3) No [mis]appropriation of crests or schools that are not yours. (Only exception: You found a real beauty in an antique shop, and are not pretending it's YOUR aristocratic family.)

4) Gold trumps silver. 18k trumps 10k.

Matthew Hewitt said...

In terms of the hand they should be worn on,I believe the tradition in the British arisocracy (which is obviously that which Prince Charles follows) was that they would be worn on the left hand. Men never wore wedding bands in that tradition (as Charles has never done), so it did not cause the issue a married man has today which is that a signet ring on a finger next to a wedding band feels a little crowded. A rather nice tradition of signet rings, which I don't know whether or not is true, but is referenced by Dorothy L Sayers in one of the Wimsey novels is that when a couple got engaged, the husband to be would give his wife to be his signet ring to wear as an engagement ring untuil the latter was available, as a sign of his committment (my recollection is that Sayers has the fact of the signet ring as the only thing which convinces Harriet the engagement wasn't a dream...).

Brummagem Joe said...

It's all to do with societal conventions. Pinky rings are the norm in Britain and much of Europe whereas here they are not for some reason despite a general societal preference for more bling on men. Wrist chains, neck chains, wedding bands, tie bars, flashy cufflinks, etc. Wedding bands for men are a relatively recent innovation in Britain which has been picked up from the US. I find it hard to believe Jeeves would have approved of wedding bands for men. These things are always in flux but when in Rome etc which really means pinky rings are out in the US.

Frank said...

WRT engineers: In the US, engineers may wear a ring in the same manner. It is a stainless steel ring, in deference to the Canadians' right to wear the Iron Ring. (It was in Canada that the Order of the Engineer tradition started; it involves a code of ethical conduct).

Unknown said...

Interesting article, however I do have one point (question) to add. I always believed that authenticity is a large part of elegance (v. posing). Thus, for those of us not descended from European nobility, what would the writer suggest as acceptable content for the signet ring? Thank you.

Unknown said...

In my family, every male member receives a ring on his 20th Birthday, in gold and bearing the families coat of arms.
Being in my mid 20s, I feel often very judged in certain environments wearing the ring, as it is very much a luxury of the past, for my age. However the way I was brought up and the circles I move in, a lot of us wear them. Those whom I know bear a signet ring and do not have a coat of arms usually have their initials engraved in some stylized manner. I think this is the most fitting thing to do should one not 'bear arms'
Great post!

 
Blog Widget by LinkWithin